How content earns trust
Everything on RPF carries a label that says how much checking has happened — from a computed first draft to an institution putting its name behind it. Here is the whole story, once, without jargon.
The four steps
Generated — the system's first draft
The platform computes a starting point automatically from building blocks already in the catalogue — for example, every published role generates an indicative flow. Nobody has reviewed this view; it is a helpful sketch, not advice.
For you: a fast orientation, free to explore.
Published — shaped by people, backed by sources
An editor has shaped the content by hand, and forward-looking claims cite the standard or guide they come from. This is the bar all public content clears before it appears in the catalogue — no panel needed.
For you: citable content you can already put to work.
Verified — checked by a panel of practitioners
Invited practitioners — a verification panel — voted on the content relationship by relationship. The outcome is a permanent, tamper-evident public record anyone can open and inspect.
For you: the industry has checked the work — and you can see exactly when and how.
Recognised — a named body puts its name to it
A professional body has formally recorded that the content meets its standard. Recognition badges always name the body, so the endorsement is attributable — never anonymous.
For you: an institution stands behind it — the strongest signal RPF carries.
Where you'll see these labels
- Maturity pills on every flow card and detail page. Browse flows →
- The flow pipeline strip on the home page counts content at each step. See the home page →
- The Trust panel on each flow states plainly which checks have happened — and which haven't yet. Open a flow →
- On transformation metro maps, validation and recognition badges light up station by station; until then the map is labelled indicative. See the maps →
- Market hubs show each role's verification status and the bodies recognising it. Browse markets →
Who does what
The system drafts. Editors publish with sources. Panels of practitioners verify. Professional bodies recognise. Each step is taken by a different hand — that separation is what makes the labels worth trusting.
The boundary, stated plainly: RPF defines and carries the standard, and emits unsigned credential templates. Your assessment partner measures against it; your body issues and signs the credential. RPF never assesses individuals and never holds learner records.