Use jurisdiction as one part of deciding whether two profiles describe comparable work.
You may select any distinct profile you can access. The comparison does not require matching jurisdictions and does not select a local reference automatically. Review both profiles’ scope, status and supporting sources before interpreting their differences.
Responsibilities may vary with local regulation, procurement practices and professional expectations. A difference between profiles can therefore reflect different work rather than a deficiency. Identify which requirements apply to the role and project being considered.
For work in Brazil, check the profile’s stated scope and the editions of any Brazilian or international references it uses. This page does not establish equivalence between those references or certify a translation.
For work in Ireland, check the applicable project requirements and the references supporting the profile. A jurisdiction label alone does not establish that a profile covers those requirements.
For work in Canada, consider the relevant province or territory, project context and language requirements. Do not assume that a reference used elsewhere can be substituted without checking its intended scope.
For any jurisdiction, browse the available profiles and review their sources. If you cannot identify a suitable reference, contact RPF to discuss what would be needed to develop one. Availability and publication arrangements must be established for that proposal.