Review and accept the Information ModelInformation Model — Description unavailable.

<p>&quot;The appointing partyappointing party — Description unavailable. shall review the information modelinformation model — Description unavailable. received in accordance with the asset information production methods and procedures. In doing this, the appointing party shall consider: its AIRAIR — Description unavailable.; its EIREIR — Description unavailable. and acceptance criteria issued to the lead appointed partylead appointed party — Description unavailable.; the delivery teamdelivery team — Description unavailable.’s MIDPMIDP — Description unavailable.; the level of information need; and delivery of information against the above. Once the review is complete, the appointing party shall: a)if the review is successful: accept the information model as a deliverable within the CDECDE — Description unavailable., and either instruct the lead appointed party to mark each information containerinformation container — Description unavailable. in the information model as being in the published state; or b)if the review is unsuccessful: record why the review was unsuccessful, reject the information model, and either instruct the lead appointed partylead appointed party — Description unavailable. to amend the information model and resubmit it for appointing party acceptance, or identify the changes required in the information model and either request the other appointing party/asset ownerasset owner — Description unavailable. to make those changes or make the changes itself. Partial acceptance of an information model can lead to coordination issues and it is recommended that the appointing party either accepts or rejects the whole information model submitted by the delivery team or received from the other appointing party/asset owner.&rdquo; ISO 19650-3ISO 19650-3 — Description unavailable. (5.7.2)</p>