Publish the future-ready standard for your discipline
Professional bodies can contribute expertise and sources to roles, profiles and flows for their discipline. Review, publication and recognition record separate decisions about the content.
Developing and recognising content
Publish your standard
Develop roles, Competency Profiles and Flows for your discipline and jurisdiction. Check their supporting sources, then take proposals through the applicable review and publication steps.
Validate with a member panel
Invite your practitioners into a verification panel — Delphi, online workshop, or focus group format. They confirm the standard relationship by relationship; the outcome is a deterministic, hash-verifiable public record your members can inspect.
Recognise
Record your professional body’s recognition with its scope and supporting details. Recognition is distinct from evidence approval, panel verification and individual assessment.
Distribute
Your standard travels: a jurisdiction-aware transformation metro map, a per-market hub, embeddable views for your own site, JSON packages for downstream tools, and unsigned credential templates (Open Badges 3.0 / W3C VC) your issuer signs.
The recognition partner workspace
Contact RPF to discuss the workspace, review process and publication arrangements your professional body needs:
- An organisation workspace with seats for your team
- Fork and localise canonical roles, profiles, and flows for your market
- Run verification panels with your invited members
- The recognition workflow — record and badge what your body stands behind
- Private exports and credential templates for your issuer
- Agree how contributions and sponsorship will be attributed
The boundary, stated plainly: RPF defines and carries the standard, and emits unsigned credential templates. Your assessment partner measures against it; your body issues and signs the credential. RPF never assesses individuals and never holds learner records.
